Tuesday, August 4, 2015

THESE IMGBOCILES WHO CAN READ ENGLISH

Category: Uncategorized 


A new NNPC boss is appointed and people complain, not about the paucity of his credentials and suitability for the job, but about the paucity of his Igboness. 

See why I have so many problems with these people? See why I think I am surrounded by imbeciles?

It is not because they are mentally retarded. It is because theirs is a diagnosis of mental putrefaction, the speed of decomposition of their powers of cerebration quickened, not slowed, by their knowledge of letters and numbers.

THE BBC: HOW HAS IVF DEVELOPED SINCE THE FIRST "TEST-TUBE BABY"?

Category: Medicine | Health | Wellness

By Adam Eley

In July 1978 Louise Brown was hailed as the world's first "test-tube baby", born through the fertility treatment IVF. But how does her story compare with modern procedures?
Louise Brown

"On the day I was born, my mum had to be taken to the operating theatre for her Caesarean section in pitch darkness, with just a torchlight showing the way," Louise Brown explains.

"Only a few staff knew who she was, and my parents didn't want others realising her identity and tipping off the newspapers."

Louise's birth was cloaked in secrecy. Even her father John's first visit to see her in Oldham General Hospital was under the eye of police officers, who lined the corridor outside.

The reason was that his daughter, from Bristol, had become the world's first "test-tube baby", as the press hailed her.

More accurately, she was the first to be born through in-vitro fertilisation (IVF), a process in which an egg is removed from the woman's ovaries and fertilised with sperm in a laboratory, before being implanted into the uterus.
IVF pioneers Robert Edwards (L) and Patrick Steptoe (R) pose with Louise and the midwife following her birth

It is a treatment used to enable couples with a range of fertility problems to conceive a child, and now allows same-sex couples and single mothers to have children too.

Technological advancements mean - according to 2013 estimates - more than five million people worldwide have been born through this process.

But in 1978 it was highly experimental, and Dr Mike Macnamee, chief executive at the world's first IVF clinic - Bourn Hall in Cambridge - believes Louise "really was a miracle".

The two men who pioneered the treatment - gynaecologist Patrick Steptoe and Nobel Prize-winning physiologist Robert Edwards - "had gone through hundreds of embryo transfers before Louise was conceived", he adds.

The pair had joined forces a full 10 years earlier, with skills that perfectly complemented one another - Edwards having developed a way to fertilise human eggs within the laboratory and Steptoe having devised a method for obtaining the eggs from the ovaries.

When Louise's mother Lesley was put in contact with Steptoe by her doctor, she was warned there was a "one in a million" chance of success.

So when it worked, it was such a momentous scientific advancement that the birth had to be filmed - under agreement with the overnment - to give documented evidence that Louise was indeed her mother's.

Even before her mother was able to hold her newborn, Louise had undergone around 60 different tests to ensure she was "normal".

This is a far cry from modern procedures, which - owing much to the work of Bourn Hall in the 1980s - follow a refined and well-established clinical process.

"Once they [Steptoe and Edwards] worked out how to fertilise the egg, they very soon wanted to restrict the number of embryos they transferred into women - so they didn't have too many multiple births," Dr Macnamee explains.
Advancements in the 1980s mean eggs can now be frozen

"Development of the freezing technique in the mid-80s meant they could implant one or two embryos [into the would-be mother] and then freeze other embryos for future use, saving her the uncomfortable procedure of having the eggs removed again."

Progress can also be seen in the modern use of ultrasound imaging to harvest the eggs under a mild sedation, rather than the form of keyhole surgery known as laparoscopy that was previously employed.

Techniques developed in the late 1980s also made a big difference in treating male infertility by injecting single sperm directly into the egg.
Intracytoplasmic sperm injection is an approach in treatment of male infertility

These, and other, small incremental steps mean the success rate for each round of IVF has grown from 10% to 40% since the early 80s, when Dr Macnamee's first role included the hands-on task of mixing the eggs and sperm in a petri dish.

The chances of successfully conceiving through IVF decline with age, but the process is now more effective per cycle than natural reproduction. It does not, however, have approval from all quarters.

In November, Pope Francis said the process promoted children as "a right rather than a gift to welcome" and was "playing with life".

Yet in August 1978, Cardinal Albino Luciani - shortly to become Pope John Paul I - unexpectedly refused to criticise Louise's parents for using IVF, saying they had simply wanted to have a baby.

"It helped to counteract some of the negative things people were saying," Louise says.

"My mum got loads of letters from people. They were mostly positive, but there was some hate mail.

"They got an awful box from America which had a broken test-tube, fake blood and a pretend foetus inside. It came with a threat that the people who sent it were coming to see them."

Despite such isolated incidents, Louise - who conceived her two sons naturally - sees it as a privilege to have been the first person born through IVF.
Louise Brown, poster girl of IVF

"My mum and dad have had lots of people say that if it wasn't for them, they would never have been able to have children," she says.

Dr Macnamee thinks the chances of women conceiving through IVF will only increase in future - and says he hopes to see a 60% success rate in IVF cycles before he retires.

One prominent area of research is aimed at exploring the way in which embryos interact with the lining of the womb when they are implanted.

Many believe it is when the two fail to engage with each other that the IVF cycle can prove unsuccessful.

Progress is slow - as there is no model to undertake tests in the lab - but workers believe this line of research could be key.



This post was culled from the BBC, where it first appeared on July 23, 2015.

Monday, August 3, 2015

EYE ON EBOLA: IS THIS THE VACCINE OR SHALL WE TRY ANOTHER?


This morning, I came across an article on the BBC which tells that, per preliminary results indices, we may now have a vaccine which could offer us full protection from the Ebola virus. 

If this is true, this would be the best piece of news we have heard with respect to Ebola since the latest outbreak started in Guinea during the harmattan of 2013. This is especially so because at that time, there were no proven vaccines or drugs that could reliably tackle the virus, and this lacuna led to the deaths of more than ten thousand people, most of them West Africans, when the epidemic gained a foothold on the subregion.

Work on this particular vaccine was started by the Public Health Agency of Canada and it was subsequently developed by Merck, an important pharmaceutical company. 

To create the vaccine, workers combined a fragment of the Ebola virus with another safer virus in order to train the human immune system to more easily defeat Ebola. The subsequent clinical trial for this drug was conducted in Guinea. But it was a clinical trial unlike the usual clinical trials. When a patient was discovered, their family, neigbours, friends, and other close contacts were vaccinated to create what the workers called a "protective ring" of immunity. One hundred patients were identified in the trial between April and July and then close contacts were vaccinated either immediately (in the case of one group), or three weeks later (in the case of the second group). 

In the 2,014 close contacts who were vaccinated immediately there were no subsequent cases of Ebola. In those vaccinated three weeks later, however, there were 16 subsequent cases of Ebola.

Based on this apparent pattern of non-recurrence of Ebola in those who get vaccinated immediately, the decision now is that close contacts of Ebola patients in Guinea will be vaccinated immediately. 

The good news gets better. So far, the vaccine has been shown to be safe. That means that the treatment can now be extended to children as well.

Although these positive results are only preliminary and so are being welcomed with all the caution due them, officials at the WHO believe the effectiveness of the vaccine will end up being between 75% and 100%.

If a vaccine like this one had been been available 18 months ago, some 11,000 lives may not have been lost, and perhaps 28,000 might not have been infected with Ebola.

But Ebola will come again. It is safe - and wise - to presume as much, and to work on that presumption.

And here, on the graves of all those whose dreams and ambitions were cut short by Ebola, germinates the hope, fed by this vaccine and others like it, that a tragedy of this scale can never be repeated.

Saturday, August 1, 2015

HOW MUCH MASTURBATION IS HARMFUL FOR YOU? [REPOSTED]

Saturday, August 01, 2015


First posted Tuesday, April 28, 2015


When I came across this picture online, I burst into a long bout of hearty (and maybe even raucous) laughter - a reaction I think the writer must have intended to provoke. It did not help any that the notice, in addition to pointing out what the toilet floors were not designed to handle, went further to allude to the prohibitive cost of "professional" removal of semen stains on the floor, and then advised readers on what to do when they got bored. Hilarious!

At first.

Then that got me thinking.

Sometimes, in the course of our fertility consultations, we encounter people - guys and babes alike - who worry that they masturbate too often. Especially among menfolk of all age groups, there seems to be this nagging uncertainty about the health impact of their hands getting all too busy down there all too often - usually when the girls are not looking. By “too often”, some of these men mean they masturbate two to four times a month, others mean getting down and creamy one to two times a day.

My take is that neither of these frequencies is outside normal limits. As such, these men do not have anything to worry about. Masturbating a few times every day is not exactly harmful, in itself. In fact, if facts are to be believed, then it is instructive that a 2003 study in Australia found that men who ejaculated more than five times a week were a third less likely than their peers to develop prostate cancer. Of course, such a frequency of ejaculation can be attained by sexual intercourse too - but that comes with its own risk of sexually transmitted infections.

So while regularly getting busy with your hands may not be expressly harmful for you, there is something else that could. If your masturbation interferes with your normal life by getting in the way of your schoolwork, your work, your sexual and other relationships, then you are in need of the services of a sex therapist. As conventional sex therapists are not exactly commonplace sights in Nigeria, you may wish to settle for an assessment by a psychologist working in conjunction with a gynaecologist who is a fertility specialist.

In summary, it is not the frequency of your masturbation that could affect you negatively. It is how much your masturbation gets in the way of your normal life that could become a problem. If, as per the notice above, you have to leave school and go home to masturbate, well, that would be you qualifying to be labelled an addict to masturbation. As with an addiction to drugs, an addiction to masturbation feeds on itself to the detriment of the sufferer. But that is what happens when masturbation goes from recreation through preoccupation to obsession.

TO THE LADY DEPRESSION THAT HAUNTS ME SO

Saturday, August 01, 2015



Hello Blues,  


This time, you took a long time coming. The sun shone brilliantly in your absence.

Hope you make this a short stay. 


This time though, I will not be moving my stuff so you can be comfortable. You see, I really have no stuff to move around anymore. You will have to make yourself as comfortable as you can while you are here. And you will have to do that without my help. 


Errrmmmm...one more thing, dear. Keep your stay short. I have learned the fine art of evicting visitors who overstay either their welcome or, as in your case, their claim to my tolerance. 


I'll take the bed tonight, every night, and as long as the night that is your stay lasts. Sorry there is no couch. The floor though is down this way. 


Be at your best behaviour. I am at mine. 



Your host,

Me.